Introduction:This case addresses the conflict between the individual's right to privacy and the state's argument for biometric data collection for Aadhaar. The case scrutinizes the essence of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.Case Details:- Name of the Case: Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs Union of India (2017)- Year: 2017- Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of IndiaArguments Presented:- Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner argued that the Aadhaar scheme, which requires biometric data, violates the right to privacy.- Respondent's Argument: The state claimed that the right to privacy is not explicitly stated in the Constitution and that Aadhaar is essential for governance and distribution of resources.Legal Analysis:The Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether the right to privacy is an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.Judgment and Ruling:The Supreme Court unanimously affirmed that the right to privacy is a fundamental right protected under Article 21 of the Constitution.Impact and Analysis:This landmark decision redefined the understanding of fundamental rights in India, emphasizing the importance of privacy in the digital age.Conclusion:The case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs Union of India established the right to privacy as an intrinsic part of the fundamental rights, shaping future policies and laws regarding personal data protection.References:- Indian Constitution, Article 21- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1

[tqb_quiz id='7175']

Discussion Questions:1. Analyze the implications of the Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs Union of India case on the privacy laws in India.2. Discuss how the right to privacy can be balanced with state interests in governance and resource distribution.

Case Study 2: Right to Privacy

You must be logged in to access this database