Introduction:This case involves a private zoo, WildEscape, and an incident where a wild animal escaped from its enclosure, causing injuries and damage in the neighboring area.Case Details:- Date of Incident: December 5, 2021- Location: Bangalore, India- Parties Involved: WildEscape (Defendant) and Local Residents (Plaintiffs)- Brief Description: A tiger escaped from its enclosure at WildEscape due to inadequate fencing, leading to a series of injuries and property damage in the surrounding locality.Arguments Presented:- Plaintiff's Argument: The residents argued that WildEscape should be held strictly liable for the damages, as keeping wild animals is an inherently dangerous activity that poses a risk to the community.- Defendant's Argument: WildEscape contended that they had taken all necessary precautions and that the escape was due to an unforeseeable act of vandalism on the fence.Legal Analysis:The court considered the principles of Strict Liability, particularly focusing on the nature of the activity (keeping wild animals) and the foreseeability of the harm.Judgment and Ruling:The court held WildEscape strictly liable for the damages caused by the tiger's escape, emphasizing that keeping wild animals comes with an inherent risk that necessitates strict adherence to safety measures.Impact and Analysis:This judgment highlighted the responsibilities of entities involved in inherently risky activities and the protective scope of Strict Liability in safeguarding the public from such dangers.Conclusion:The case illustrates the legal implications of engaging in activities involving inherent risks and the application of Strict Liability to ensure accountability and safety.References:- Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 (India)- Rylands v. Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330

[tqb_quiz id='8177']

Discussion Questions:1. Analyze the balance between individual property rights and public safety in the context of Strict Liability.2. How should entities that handle inherently dangerous activities mitigate risks to avoid liability under the doctrine of Strict Liability?These case studies offer a deep dive into the application of Strict Liability in various contexts, providing insights into legal principles, judgments, and the societal implications of the doctrine. The MCQs and discussion questions serve as tools for further understanding and debate on these crucial legal matters.

Case Study 3: The Wild Animal Escape

You must be logged in to access this database